🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. He weathered an important continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A New Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.