🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.